Transactional and litigation services for local, national and international businesses.
Corporate & Business Law
CUTLER & WILENSKY LLP provides transactional and litigation services to local, national, and international businesses. Our business attorneys represent publicly held corporations, closely held corporations, sole proprietorships, nonprofit corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, limited partnerships, joint ventures, and trusts in the handling and fulfilling of their transactional and litigation needs. CW handles a breadth of transactional matters from the selection and formation of an entity to the negotiating and drafting of contracts, corporate governance, and the management of employment issues to the sale of the company or its assets. CW also guides its clients through the not-so-clear world of litigation, and when needed, through trial. The industry sectors served by CW include information technology, software, staffing, communications, manufacturing, construction, real estate, medical, accounting, retail, and trade associations.
CW’s lead trial counsel recently defeated a summary judgment motion brought by a nursing home care facility whereby the facility claimed it was immune from liability under the COVID-19 Liability Protection Act. The Worcester Superior Court found that the COVID-19 Liability Protection Act did not apply because the facility was not providing care services to the plaintiff and the motion could not be granted because there was a dispute as to material facts as to whether the facility acted in good faith in its actions towards plaintiff.
CW’s lead trial counsel recently defeated a complex summary judgment motion against its client in Middlesex Superior Court claiming the mislabeling of a business bank account as a payroll account constituted a violation of law.
Business & Corporate Law
CW Defeats Motion to Dismiss
Attorney Cutler recently defeated a motion to dismiss brought in a case involving a dispute over the ownership of a certain portion of a condominium. Judge Sarrouf in his ruling denied the entirety of the defendants’ motion to dismiss and authorized the entirety of the case to proceed.
